| RSNA
RSNA Press Release

MRI Shows Brain Differences Among ADHD Patients

Share: Share on Facebook PDF

Released: November 22, 2017

At A Glance

  • Brain MRIs can help identify people with ADHD and distinguish among subtypes of the condition.
  • Alterations in the shape of three brain regions contributed significantly to distinguishing children with ADHD from typically developing controls.
  • Features involved in the default mode network and the insular cortex significantly contributed to discriminating the ADHD subtypes.

OAK BROOK, Ill. — Information from brain MRIs can help identify people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and distinguish among subtypes of the condition, according to a study appearing online in the journal Radiology.

download full-size photo

Qiyong Gong, M.D., Ph.D.,

Qiyong Gong, M.D., Ph.D.

ADHD is a disorder of the brain characterized by periods of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsive behavior. The disorder affects 5 to 7 percent of children and adolescents worldwide, according to the ADHD Institute. The three primary subtypes of ADHD are predominantly inattentive, predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and a combination of inattentive and hyperactive.

While clinical diagnosis and subtyping of ADHD is currently based on reported symptoms, psychoradiology, which applies imaging data analysis to mental health and neurological conditions, has emerged in recent years as a promising tool for helping to clarify diagnoses.

Study co-author Qiyong Gong, M.D., Ph.D., and colleagues at West China Hospital of Sichuan University in Chengdu, China, recently introduced an analytical framework for psychoradiology that involves cerebral radiomics — the extraction of a large amount of quantitative information from digital imaging features that can be mined for disease characteristics. Radiomics, combined with other patient characteristics, could improve diagnostic power and help speed appropriate treatment to patients.

"The main aim of the current study was to establish classification models that can assist the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist in diagnosing and subtyping of ADHD based on relevant radiomics signatures," Dr. Gong said.

With the help of his West China Hospital colleagues Huaiqiang Sun, Ph.D., and Ying Chen, M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Gong studied 83 children, ranging in age from of 7 to 14, with newly diagnosed and never-treated ADHD. The group included children with the inattentive ADHD subtype and the combined subtype. Researchers compared brain MRI results with those of a control group of 87 healthy, similarly aged children. The researchers used a relatively new feature that allowed them to screen relevant radiomics signatures from more than 3,100 quantitative features extracted from the gray and white matter.

No overall difference was found between ADHD and controls in total brain volume or total gray and white matter volumes. However, differences emerged when the researchers looked at specific regions within the brain. Alterations in the shape of three brain regions (left temporal lobe, bilateral cuneus and areas around left central sulcus) contributed significantly to distinguishing ADHD from typically developing controls.

Within the ADHD population, features involved in the default mode network, which is a network of brain regions active when an individual is not engaged in a specific task, and the insular cortex, an area with diverse functions related to emotion, significantly contributed to discriminating the ADHD inattentive subtype from the combined subtype.

Overall, the radiomics signatures allowed discrimination of ADHD patients and healthy control children with 74 percent accuracy and discrimination of ADHD inattentive and ADHD combined subtypes with 80 percent accuracy.

"This imaging-based classification model could be an objective adjunct to facilitate better clinical decision making," Dr. Gong said. "Additionally, the present study adds to the developing field of psychoradiology, which seems primed to play a major clinical role in guiding diagnostic and treatment planning decisions in patients with psychiatric disorders."

The researchers plan to recruit more newly diagnosed ADHD patients to validate the results and learn more about imaging-based classification. They also intend to apply the analytic approach to other mental or neurological disorders and test its feasibility in a clinical environment, where the fully automatic analytic framework can be readily deployed, Dr. Gong said.

"Psychoradiology utility of MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Radiomics Analysis." Collaborating with Drs. Gong, Sun and Chen were Qiang Huang, Ph.D., Su Lui, Ph.D., Xiaoqi Huang, Ph.D., Yan Shi, M.D., Xin Xu, M.D., and John A. Sweeney, Ph.D.

Radiology is edited by Herbert Y. Kressel, M.D., Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., and owned and published by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. (http://radiology.rsna.org/)

RSNA is an association of over 54,000 radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists and related scientists, promoting excellence in patient care and health care delivery through education, research and technologic innovation. The Society is based in Oak Brook, Ill. (RSNA.org)

For patient-friendly information on brain MRI, visit RadiologyInfo.org.

Images (.JPG and .TIF format)

Thumbnail
Figure 1. Diagram shows workflow for extracting radiomics features from T1-weighted and diffusion-tensor images. FA = fractional anisotropy, MD = mean diffusivity, AD = axial diffusivity, and RD = radial diffusivity

High-res (TIF) version
(Right-click and Save As)
Thumbnail
Figure 2. Flowchart shows feature selection and model training. Rectangles in blue represent data and rectangles in gray represent the processes. The all-relevant features selection step was nested in repeated 10-fold cross validation.

High-res (TIF) version
(Right-click and Save As)
Thumbnail
Figure 3. Graphs show distribution of significant features that discriminated ADHD and healthy control subjects. FA = fractional anisotropy

High-res (TIF) version
(Right-click and Save As)
Thumbnail
Figure 4. Distribution of significant features that discriminated ADHD-I and ADHD-C. FA = fractional anisotropy.

High-res (TIF) version
(Right-click and Save As)